Much of the recent theoretical computational work on market equilibrium uses the, so called, Fisher Model (see chapters 5 and 6 of the AGT book or talks and papers on Vijay Vazirani’s home page.) The model is somewhat simpler than Arrow-Debreu markets in that one party, the seller, brings into the market all goods except for money, which is the only thing that the others bring. This seemingly small variation seems to make handling it more tractable. In his ALGO invited talk, Vijay opined that Irving Fisher, the model’s father, is somewhat forgotten today probably due to his famous words just days before the stock market crash of 1929: “Stock prices have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau.” Vijay pointed out that Fisher’s comments just a little later are captured on youtube:
Fisher Model of Markets
September 14, 2009 by algorithmicgametheory
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged video | 4 Comments
4 Responses
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Recently Popular Posts
Archives
- December 2022
- February 2022
- December 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- January 2021
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- September 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- February 2016
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
Hasanhodzic, Lo and Viola have some interesting ideas about performing an analysis of the dynamic consequences of even simpler markets (see:”A Computational View of Market Efficiency” http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.4580 ). And I have been playing around with the idea of even simpler market models (see: http://www.win-vector.com/blog/2009/09/a-discrete-model-gauging-market-efficiency/#Hasanhodzic:2009p2605 ). Obviously the extra simplicity lowers the relevance of the results a bit, but it is a direction that may interest readers of “Algorithmic Game Theory.”
How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?
By PAUL KRUGMAN
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html
What’s Taking place i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It positively useful and it has aided me out loads. I’m hoping to contribute & assist
other customers like its aided me. Great job.
free sample gillette proglide